I’m
going to try to not sound like a broken record from my last post, but the
topics are pretty similar. Chapter 7 in the Qualman book discusses how Twitter
and other social media platforms have condensed and shortened the expectations
of information in the media, since Twitter limits posts to 140 characters. The
chapter goes on to discuss how different companies are trying to adhere to
these new rules.
I’ve
learned in my studies as a Digital Communications major that certain media,
like videos, need to be short and concise in order to keep users’ attention. If
the video runs too long (or the blog post or the article or whatever it may
be), then the audience will lose interest and not view the rest of it. It is
partly for this reason that Twitter is so successful: it’s condensed and
concise. This is also very important in the mobile world.
Companies
need to design for mobile devices because that is the future of the industry. In
an article I found on Mashable, it
states that people use Twitter on their smartphones more than 10 times more
than they do on desktop computers. Facebook’s number of mobile users is not
nearly as impressive. That is because it feels like Twitter was made for mobile
usage. It’s just natural to scroll through tweets on my phone. I often find
that I check Twitter on my phone much more than I check it on my computer.
Facebook,
on the other hand, feels like a chore when I am on the app. I have often heard
complaints about the Facebook app, and I have to agree with them. Besides the
technical problems, the interface of Facebook simply does not have the same
flow that Twitter’s does. This goes to show how Twitter is paving the way for
how mobile apps should be designed.
I agree with you, but I also feel like Twitter was designed to be more of a social network site where people could constantly post what they were doing throughout their day, thus the small amount of characters. Facebook allows you to leave status updates, but is also able to post photo albums among other things that Twitter is not used as much for.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the Facebook app is more complex in its set up and amount of options. However, I don't know that its navigation is an issue. I think a lot of it comes down to people being used to Twitter and what they use that platform for. As Amanda said above, it has a lot of other options for users to complete various tasks that Twitter does not offer. Therefore, it is not necessarily true that Twitter should be the basis for mobile app creation. Instead, the way an individual wants an app to be created pretty much depends on what they plan on using it for.
ReplyDelete